7 Core Personality Factors: Definitions and Examples

Home » Blog » 7 Core Personality Factors: Definitions and Examples

Personality has long captivated the field of psychology, serving as one of its most fascinating and widely applied areas. The roots of experimental psychology and the study of human personality trace back to the late 19th century, when German physiologist and philosopher Wilhelm Wundt laid the groundwork for this burgeoning field1. Over the next century, research advanced significantly, culminating in a study by Costa and McCrae that found most personality traits can be viewed as facets of five core personality factors: Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism (low Emotional Stability).2 These traits collectively form the Five-Factor Model (FFM), often summarized by the acronym “OCEAN.”

Building on this foundation, Canadian psychology professors Kibeom Lee and Michael C. Ashton introduced the HEXACO model by adding Honesty/Humility as a sixth factor.3 Today, SIGMA Personality has further refined our understanding by dividing Conscientiousness into two distinct higher-order factors: Industriousness and Methodicalness, resulting in a seven-factor model. This expanded framework offers a deeper understanding of individuals’ conscientiousness, which has been described as “the most potent, non-cognitive predictor of workplace performance.”4 In this blog, SIGMA’s experts delve into the definitions, benefits, and key considerations for each of these seven core personality factors.

7 Core Personality Factors

  1. Agreeableness
  2. Emotional Stability
  3. Extraversion
  4. Honesty/Humility
  5. Industriousness
  6. Methodicalness
  7. Openness to Experience

1. Agreeableness

What is Agreeableness?

Agreeableness refers to the tendency to get along easily with others and be willing to help those in need. People who score high on Agreeableness are forgiving, non-judgmental, and trusting in nature.

6 Traits of Agreeable People:

Cooperative, empathetic, forgiving, non-judgmental, nurturing, trusting.

Benefits of Strong Agreeableness:
  • High scores on Agreeableness are positively related to group performance.5
  • High scores on Agreeableness are negatively related to abusive supervision.6
  • Agreeableness is positively related to supportive leadership7 and the charismatic dimension of transformational leadership.8
  • Agreeableness has been shown to predict the growth of interpersonal relationships9.
Cautions for High Scores on Agreeableness:
  • May prefer to avoid conflict rather than manage or proactively mitigate it.
  • May try to please others and avoid offering alternative opinions or ideas, even if they are viable or better options.
  • May be overly trusting of other people, allowing them to be taken advantage of.
Cautions for Low Scores on Agreeableness:
  • May be prone towards instigating or exacerbating conflict.
  • May adopt a contentious perspective for unproductive purposes.
  • May disrupt group cohesion, teambuilding, and unity.

2. Emotional Stability

What is Emotional Stability?

Emotional Stability refers to the tendency to remain calm and composed when faced with uncertain or stressful situations. People who score high on Emotional Stability are confident and capable of regulating their moods.

6 Traits of Emotionally Stable People:

Accepting of criticism, carefree, even-tempered, capable of handling stress, optimistic, strong self-esteem.

Benefits of Strong Emotional Stability:
  • High scores on Emotional Stability have been linked to greater career resilience.10
  • The ability to regulate emotions is associated with better mental health outcomes.11
  • Emotional Stability is related to better job satisfaction and performance.12
Cautions for High Scores on Emotional Stability:
  • May not be able to share in strong emotions to the same extent as others on their team.
  • May struggle to understand or be patient with those who are more sensitive to negative emotions
  • May not take emotional factors into account when communicating or making decisions.
Cautions for Low Scores on Emotional Stability:
  • May not effectively handle pressure, uncertainty, or stressful situations.
  • May struggle with receiving constructive criticism and managing conflict.
  • May let emotions impede job productivity and satisfaction.

3. Extraversion

What is Extraversion?

Extraversion refers to the tendency to enjoy, feel comfortable, and demonstrate confidence in group settings, including persuading others and assuming leadership roles. Extraverted people are able to modify their actions and words to suit different situations.

6 Traits of Extraverted People:

Desiring affiliation (belonging), desiring to lead, enjoying attention, persuasive, socially adaptable, socially confident.

Benefits of Strong Extraversion:
  • Out of all personality traits, Extraversion is the best and most consistent predictor of important leadership outcomes;13 Extraversion has also been found to be positively related to transformational leadership14,15,16,17,18 and charismatic leadership.19
  • Extraversion is associated with greater life satisfaction and positive relationships.20
  • On average, extraverted individuals score higher on motivation and performance.21
Cautions for High Scores on Extraversion:
  • May struggle to stay motivated and focused when working independently.
  • May have a tendency of dominating conversations and struggle with active listening.
  • May have a hard time working remotely if living on their own.
Cautions for Low Scores on Extraversion:
  • May avoid meetings and teamwork even when they would be beneficial.
  • May take longer to adapt to new teams.
  • May be less inclined towards management, liaison, or other roles that require more assertiveness or leadership skills.

4. Honesty/Humility

What is Honesty/Humility?

Honesty/Humility refers to the tendency to be truthful, humble, and straightforward with others. People who score high on Honesty/Humility avoid taking risks and carefully follow established rules.

6 Traits of Honest/Humble People:

Modest, risk averse, rule compliant, sincere, truthful, unentitled.

Benefits of Strong Honesty/Humility:
  • Studies have shown that leaders’ Honesty/Humility is negatively related to abusive supervision22 and positively related to ethical23 and authentic leadership.24
  • Honesty/Humility is positively correlated with supervisor ratings of overall job performance;25 in fact, in measures of individual and contextual performance, humility has been shown to compensate for lower cognitive ability.26
  • Leaders’ expressed humility is positively related with follower engagement.27
Cautions for High Scores on Honesty/Humility:
  • May be less adept at communicating strategically and knowing when it is wise to omit information.
  • May overlook opportunities due to a strong aversion to risk.
  • May struggle to be innovative and creative if they strictly adhere to established procedures.
Cautions for Low Scores on Honesty/Humility:
  • May be more prone towards risk-taking and bending the rules.
  • May be inclined toward twisting or obscuring difficult news or undesired outcomes.
  • May disrupt group cohesion by acting entitled and arrogant.

5. Industriousness

What is Industriousness?

Industriousness refers to the tendency to strive tirelessly for excellence. People who score high on Industriousness work hard, set challenging goals, and derive meaning from work.

6 Traits of Industrious People:

Achievement-oriented, competitive, high/sustained energy, engaged, hard-working, persistent.

Benefits of Strong Industriousness:
  • Employees who are engaged in their work tend to do better on overall scores of productivity, well-being, and organizational citizenship.28
  • Organizations are more profitable and productive when their employees are engaged.29
  • Employee competitiveness is positively related to innovation and career satisfaction.30
Cautions for High Scores on Industriousness:
  • May wear out, stress, or frustrate individuals who cannot match their high and sustained energy.
  • May disrupt teamwork with their strong competitive spirit.
  • May prioritize achievement over maintaining relationships or work/life balance.
Cautions for Low Scores on Industriousness:
  • May struggle to stay motivated or to motivate others.
  • May be more prone to giving up when a project or relationship becomes difficult.
  • May be less inclined to strive for excellence in their work.

6. Methodicalness

What is Methodicalness?

Methodicalness refers to the tendency to act in a deliberate and planful manner. People who score high on Methodicalness can be counted on to meet commitments and deadlines.

6 Traits of Methodical People:

Strong impulse control, organized, planner, punctual, reliable, self-disciplined.

Benefits of Strong Methodicalness:
  • Employees with good time management skills are more engaged, proactive, and productive in their roles.31
  • There is a positive association between time management skills and reduced stress levels among employees.32
  • Self-control is related to higher salary and occupational prestige.33
Cautions for High Scores on Methodicalness:
  • May focus excessively on planning and neglect to implement plans.
  • May struggle to make quick decisions or take part in activities spontaneously.
  • May have difficulty being flexible and adapting project goals and timelines.
Cautions for Low Scores on Methodicalness:
  • May have difficulty adhering to standardized processes.
  • May deprioritize punctuality and reliability.
  • May struggle to spot subtle mistakes or deliver a high-quality product when the work requires attention to detail.

7. Openness to Experience

What is Openness to Experience?

Openness to Experience refers to the tendency to enjoy creative pursuits and original thinking. People who score high on Openness to Experience thrive when there is an opportunity to learn, discuss differences of opinion, or try something new.

6 Traits of People Who Are Open to Experience:

Abstract thinking, appreciation of aesthetics, breadth of interest, embraces change, embraces differences, innovative.

Benefits of Strong Openness to Experience:
  • Openness to Experience is positively related to subjective well-being.34
  • Being open minded has a positive, significant effect on group learning capacity.35
  • Trying something new has been found to increase the brain’s ability to adapt and solve problems.36
Cautions for High Scores on Openness to Experience:
  • May be inclined towards change and innovation when maintaining the status quo is the better option.
  • May require a variety of tasks to satisfy their intellectual curiosity.
  • May prolong the completion of routine, practical tasks because of a preference for those involving thinking or creativity.
Cautions for Low Scores on Openness to Experience:
  • May prefer to follow established procedures rather than trying novel methods that might be more effective.
  • May struggle to appreciate different personalities, experiences, and approaches to work.
  • May have difficulty grasping “the big picture,” including abstract concepts such as long-term strategy or mission/vision statements.

7 Core Personality Factors: How to Measure

Are you ready to measure the seven core personality factors outlined above? SIGMA Personality provides a convenient and scientifically validated solution. Administered online through SIGMA’s state-of-the-art platform, this assessment takes only 20 minutes to complete, making it an ideal tool for your research and talent development initiatives. Complete the form below to share your objectives, and let us help you unlock the full potential of your team. We look forward to hearing from you.

Get Started with SIGMA

Are you interested in using our assessments? Apply for a research discount or follow the steps below to submit an order.

Step 1: Complete the Test User Qualifications Form

Step 2: Download the Assessment Order Form

Step 3: Submit Your Assessment Order Form

If you have any questions about our assessments or the application process, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Our team would be happy to speak with you.

1 Rieber, R. W. (Robert W. ). (1980). Wilhelm Wundt and the making of a scientific psychology. Plenum Press.
2 Costa, P. & McCrae, R. R. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives, 2, 51-87.
3 Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907.
4 Campbell, D. (2019, November 4). Being conscientious is one of the strongest predictors of success in the workplace, U of T study finds. University of Toronto. https://www.utoronto.ca/news/being-conscientious-one-strongest-predictors-success-workplace-u-t-study-finds.
5 Yukl, G., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 147-197). Consulting Psychologists Press.
6 Breevaart, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2017). Supervisor’s HEXACO personality traits and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 691-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.001.
7 de Vries, R. E. (2012). Personality predictors of leadership styles and the self-other agreement problem. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 809-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.002.
8 Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5),751-765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751.
9 Yang, D., & Tu, C. (2020). Influence of college students’ agreeableness on interpersonal relationships: Moderating role of empathy. Education and Urban Society, 53(4), 383-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124520928609.
10 Arora, R., & Rangnekar, S. (2015). Relationships between emotional stability, psychosocial mentoring support and career resilience. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i1.835.
11 Kraiss, J. T., ten Klooster, P. M., Moskowitz, J. T., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2020). The relationship between emotion regulation and well-being in patients with mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 102, Article 152189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152189.
12 Judge, T.A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80.
13 Zhang, J., Yin, K., & Li, S. (2022). Leader extraversion and team performance: A moderated mediation model. PLoS One, 17 (12), Article e027876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278769
14 Felfe, J., & Schyns, B. (2006). Personality and the perception of transformational leadership: The impact of extraversion, neuroticism, personal need for structure, and occupational self efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 708-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00026.x.
15 Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-Factor Model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 751-765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751.
16 Lim, B. C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relations to the Five-Factor Model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 610-621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.610.
17 Phipps, S. T., & Prieto, L. C. (2011). The influence of personality factors on transformational leadership: Exploring the moderating role of political skill. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(3), 430-447.
18 Rubin, R. S., Munz, D. C., & Bommer, W. H. (2005). Leading from within: The effects of emotion recognition and personality on transformational leadership behaviour. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 845-858. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803926.
19 de Vries, R. E. (2012). Personality predictors of leadership styles and the self-other agreement problem. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 809-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.002.
20 Wilmot, M. P., Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Ones, D. S. (2019). Extraversion advantages at work: A quantitative review and synthesis of the meta-analytic evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(12), 1447–1470. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000415.
21 Ibid.
22 Breevaart, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2017). Supervisor’s HEXACO personality traits and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.001.
23 de Vries, R. E. (2012). Personality predictors of leadership styles and the self-other agreement problem. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 809-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.002.
24 Malik, M. F., Burhan, Q., & Khan, M. A. (2023). The role of HEXACO in the development of authentic leadership and its consequences on task performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-08-2022-0356.
25 Shen, M., Rowatt, W. & Petrini, L. (2011). A new trait on the market: Honesty-Humility as a unique predictor of job performance ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 857-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.011.
26 Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for
performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517-1538. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0795
27 Ibid.
28 Gallup. (2024). The relationship between engagement at work and organizational outcomes: Q12® Meta-Analysis [11th Ed.]. Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/321725/gallup-q12-meta-analysis-report.aspx
29 Ibid.
30 Songke, X., Meng, X., Chaoping, L., & Dege, L. (2023). Can trait competitiveness foster positive outcomes? The role of perceived insider status and leader competitiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 202, Article 111968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111968.
31 Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710726136.
32 Bond M. J., & Feather, N.T. (1988). Some correlates of structure and purpose in the use of time. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(4), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.321.
33 Converse, P., Pathak, J., DePaul-Haddock, A., Gotlib, T., & Merbedone, M. (2012). Controlling your environment and yourself: Implications for career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.07.003.
34 Tucaković, L., & Nedeljković, B. (2023). Personality and affective correlates of openness to experience from Big Five and HEXACO personality models: The dual nature of Big Five openness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 105(4), 544-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2117047.
35 Lord, M. (2015). Group learning capacity: The roles of open-mindedness and shared vision. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 150. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00150.
36 Park, A. J., Harris, A. Z., Martyniuk, K. M., Chang, C.-Y., Abbas, A. I., Lowes, D. C., Kellendonk, C., Gogos, J. A., & Gordon, J. A. (2021). Reset of hippocampal-prefrontal circuitry facilitates learning. Nature, 591(7851), 615–619. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03272-1.