Retained Search Firms

These firms operate on an exclusive basis, preventing other search firms or recruiters from being involved in the search. Retained search firms are paid a flat fee, regardless of the outcome, and they specialize in senior executive search.

Contingency Search Teams

These executive search firms are compensated only upon the successful placement of a candidate. This model means their commitment to each search may vary, often prioritizing speed and accessibility of candidates over finding industry-leading talent. Typically, they target individuals who are actively seeking employment, rather than scouting top performers not actively on the job market. Contingency search firms may serve multiple organizations at once, and may present the same candidate to multiple employers, including competitors. This practice can elevate candidate compensation demands, which in turn increases the contingency placement fee, which is typically a percentage of the first-year salary.

Hybrid Retained-Contingency Search Firms

These firms, often called “container” or “retingency” search firms, combine the benefits of both retained and contingency models. While they operate on an exclusive engagement basis similar to retained firms, their fee structure is more flexible. Clients pay a portion of the fee upfront, akin to a retained search, but the remainder of the fee is contingent upon the successful placement of a candidate, mirroring the contingency approach. This model offers a blend of commitment and performance-based payment, appealing to organizations seeking both exclusivity and financial flexibility.

Download the case study to learn about the fee models and expected costs associated with each type of executive recruitment firm.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Executive Recruitment

Executive search firms offer a range of benefits but also come with notable challenges. Understanding both sides can help organizations make informed decisions about whether to invest in external recruitment support.

Advantages of Executive Search Firms:

Advantages of working with executive search firms include:

1. Access to High-Caliber Talent

Executive search firms specialize in identifying and attracting passive candidates — those who are not actively seeking new opportunities but highly qualified for leadership roles. Their extensive networks and industry insights often lead to a pool of candidates who might otherwise be unreachable.

2. Expertise and Industry Knowledge

Executive search firms specialize in executive recruitment, which means they understand the nuances of leadership roles across various industries. This deep knowledge can help ensure that candidates not only possess the necessary skills and experience but also align with the organization’s strategic goals.

3. Time and Resource Efficiency

Recruiting for executive roles can be a lengthy and resource-intensive process. By outsourcing this function, organizations can reallocate internal resources, allowing HR teams to focus on other strategic priorities. Executive search firms handle everything from candidate identification to initial screening, streamlining and expediting the recruitment process.

4. Confidentiality and Discretion

For sensitive searches — such as replacing a current leader or filling a newly created role — maintaining confidentiality is paramount. Executive search firms are skilled at managing discreet searches that protect both the organization’s interests and the candidate’s privacy.

Disadvantages of Executive Search Firms:

Disadvantages of working with executive search firms:

1. High Costs

One of the biggest drawbacks of using an executive search firm is the expense. Their fees, often calculated as a percentage of the new hire’s first-year compensation, can be substantial. This cost might be hard to justify, particularly for small to medium-sized organizations or startups with limited budgets.

2. Potential Misalignment with Company Culture

While executive search firms have extensive networks, they might not fully understand their client’s unique organizational culture. This can lead to candidates who meet technical qualifications but struggle to integrate into the organization’s culture or long-term vision.

3. Overdependence on External Expertise

Relying heavily on an external recruiters can sometimes mean internal talent gets overlooked. When organizations fail to develop leaders from within, top employees may leave due to a lack of growth opportunities. This can create a cycle of dependency on executive search firms to fill continuous vacancies on their leadership bench.

4. Inconsistent Quality and Fit

Not all executive search firms are created equal. Some may prioritize quick placements over finding the perfect fit, while others might have biases toward certain industries or roles. It is important to choose a firm with a proven track record and one that takes the time to understand an organization’s specific needs.

Executive search firms can be a powerful ally in the quest for exceptional leadership. Their access to elite talent, industry expertise, and ability to conduct confidential searches are significant assets. However, the high costs, potential cultural mismatches, and the risk of becoming reliant on external resources are challenges that organizations must carefully consider.

Alternatives to Executive Recruitment

Given the challenges outlined above, Hei isn’t convinced executive recruitment is the right solution for her team. She decides to research alternative options and identifies a few viable solutions her organization should consider:

Adopting Hiring Software

Hei’s organization could invest in — or temporarily subscribe to — hiring software that may help them complete the executive search process on their own. A quick Google search indicated that such executive recruitment software typically ranges from $30 to $100 per month. However, researching, selecting, and learning to use the software would require additional time and effort. This option, similar to working with a recruiting research firm, would also leave Hei and her team with a lot of work that she didn’t think they had the capacity for this quarter.

Starting with an Interim Executive

As an alternative to executive recruitment, Hei’s organization could hire an interim executive, affording them more time to seek a permanent successor on their own. Hei’s research suggested that an interim executive could be hired for almost any length of time, or even on a part-time basis.

In terms of fees, interim executives are usually quoted at an hourly, daily, or monthly rate. According to the “1% rule,” an interim leader’s daily rate should equal 1% of a permanent candidate’s annual compensation. This would imply a daily cost of approximately $2,000, or $360,000 for six months, significantly exceeding the salary of a permanent president, making it an effective yet cost prohibitive option.

Consulting with a Succession Planning Expert

Lastly, Hei considered working with a succession planning consultant, specialists in evaluating, selecting, and developing talent. Such consultants could assist in creating a leadership pipeline for the president’s role and other key positions, addressing immediate needs and preventing future crises by preparing an internal talent pool. The starting price for these services is close to $20,000, which is a much more feasible price point for Hei’s organization. The only problem is that she still doesn’t have any internal talent who are ready and willing to step into the president role. Hei decided to explore the succession planning consulting option further to see whether a consulting engagement could help her organization bridge the gap.

Download the case study to read Hei’s findings.

The Decision

A week later, Hei found herself seated in the boardroom with the board of directors. She briefly explained each of the c-suite executive recruitment solutions she had explored, ultimately focusing on the two alternatives she believed merited their consideration. Download the case study for a complete explanation of each alternative, as well as tables that break down the expected costs, pros, and cons of each option.

Speak with a Consultant